Archive for the ‘Uncategorized’ Category

New Medical Conditions — Including Early-Onset Alzheimer’s Disease — Now Qualify for Automatic Disability Benefits

Monday, March 8th, 2010

Social Security Disability (SSD) benefits are paid to individuals who, after having worked for many years, develop a disabling condition, prior to their normal retirement age, that is so severe that they are no longer able to work. Applicants for Social Security disability benefits often have to wait months, and sometimes years, for approval from the government, even if they are clearly eligible for benefits. However, in certain circumstances the Social Security Administration (SSA) will fast-track a disability benefits application through a process known as Compassionate Allowances, usually because the applicant is suffering from a severe disability that may be life-threatening.  If an applicant is suffering from any of the conditions on the Compassionate Allowances list, his application is fast-tracked because it is presumed that he is a person with disabilities. This speeds up the application process and assists people suffering from serious conditions by awarding benefits quickly, when they are most needed.

When a person with disabilities submits an application for benefits, the SSA normally passes the application through a rigorous five-step process to ensure that the applicant truly needs assistance. The SSA first checks to see if the applicant is working, and then assesses whether the applicant is suffering from a “severe” medical condition. In the third step of the process, the SSA compares the beneficiary’s condition to a list of impairments that normally qualify a person for benefits without further assessment. When a person’s condition matches a condition on the list of impairments, the SSA presumes that the applicant has a disability and typically awards benefits without proceeding through the final two steps.

Unfortunately, most applicants typically have to wait for a long time before arriving at this third step in the evaluation process. Compassionate Allowances speed this process up by defining certain specific conditions that “obviously meet disability standards.” Prior to this month, the SSA included 50 medical conditions on the list of conditions that qualified for a Compassionate Allowance.  As of March 1, 2010, the SSA has now added an additional 38 conditions to the Compassionate Allowances list, greatly expanding the number of people who are eligible for the Compassionate Allowances program.

Although most of the conditions on the revised list are rare, of tremendous importance for the aging population is the fact that the SSA has now included Early-Onset Alzheimer’s Disease, Mixed Dementia, and Primary Progressive Aphasia among the new fast-track conditions, meaning that people who are diagnosed with any of these conditions can now receive disability benefits very quickly. In addition to a monthly disability payment, qualification for SSDI also allows earlier entry to Medicare health insurance benefits for those under age 65.  And for those under age 65 whose conditions are so severe that they must be placed in a nursing home, a disability determination from SSA also speeds up the Medicaid application process.

Please follow the links below to learn more about the Compassionate Allowance program:

Initial List of Compassionate Allowance Conditions

38 New Compassionate Allowance Conditions

Additional information about how compassionate allowances are processed

Statements from Family Members and Individuals with Early-Onset Alzheimer’s Disease

How to Make the Best Nursing Home Placement for Your Loved One

Tuesday, February 16th, 2010

Most nursing home admissions happen under extremely stressful circumstances. If you are faced with the overwhelming task of finding the best nursing home placement for a loved one, where do you begin? Although this is a job that no one wants, it can be done with forethought and confidence that the best decision was made for everyone involved.  It’s easier, and better for your loved one, if the first placement is well thought out. Although a nursing home resident can be moved from one facility to another, this type of disruption can be very disturbing and is rarely in everyone’s best interest.

The federal Center for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) has a part of its Web site – Nursing Home Compare — comparing nursing homes, which identifies facilities that have a history of poor performance. The Nursing Home Compare site labels nursing homes it calls Special Focus Facilities — those that have repeatedly violated state and federal health and safety rules and that rank in the worst 5 to 10 percent of all inspected facilities in a given state.  Using Nursing Home Compare, you can obtain detailed inspection information about each nursing facility that interests you, comparing various government-rated “quality measures” such as:

• Percent of Residents Who Have Moderate to Severe Pain;
• Percent of High-Risk Residents Who Have Pressure Sores;
• Percent of Residents Who Were Physically Restrained; and
• Percent of Residents Who Spend Most of Their Time in Bed or in a Chair.

The Nursing Home Compare Web site also rates the care and services that each facility provides to its residents, and allows you to view how each facility stacks up in staffing hours for each type of health care worker against the state and national averages.

U.S. News and World Report also recently started providing rankings of America’s nursing homes. The U.S. News rankings rely on Nursing Home Compare but provide some advanced search engine capability.   According to U.S. News,  their new feature –America’s Best Nursing Homes – addresses these and other issues.  Nursing homes are presented in tiers within each star category, based on their total stars in all three of the major areas. The topmost tier, for example, consists only of five-star homes that got 15 stars. The next tier down is five-star homes with 14 total stars, and so on. Within each tier, nursing homes are listed alphabetically. If you’re looking for a nursing home by location, and turn up too many, search terms can be combined in order to narrow the results.  For example, perhaps you want to search just for nursing homes that have a religious affiliation, or that accept Medicaid residents. Or you can launch a multipronged search, perhaps searching for non-profit four-star nursing homes that accept Medicaid and are located within 25 miles of a particular city. 

Placing your loved one in a nursing home that accepts Medicaid is vitally important if you plan to use the services of an Elder Law firm  (such as the Farr Law Firm) to help you with Medicaid Asset Protection.

Another free Web site that lets you compare nursing homes is MemberoftheFamily.net, which features easy-to-read, color-coded assessments of nursing homes nationwide.

Despite the ratings, in my experience nothing can substitute for visiting a nursing home in person. Virtually every nursing home will
have some deficiencies; after all, working with extremely disabled and impaired persons is very difficult. In my book, The Virginia Nursing Home Survival Guide (available as a free e-book on our Web site or in print edition at Amazon.com), I provide a Nursing Home Evaluation Tool to help consumers compare nursing homes during personal visits.

To find the best possible nursing home for your family’s situation, the first step is to determine what is most important for your family in looking for a facility. The resident’s needs and desires must be included in this evaluation. Consider variables such as location of the facility, whether a special care unit (such as for dementia) is available, and what types of payment sources are accepted. 

The second step is to identify the facilities in your area which meet the criteria you have established.

Step three is to tour those facilities you have identified in step two.  You don’t need to schedule your visits in advance. If you show up during regular business hours, you should be able to meet with an administrative staff member, who should be able to answer all your questions.  You will also want to tour a second time, in the evening or on the weekend, to see if there is a drastic difference in the atmosphere of the facility or the care being provided. It is important to tour at least two facilities so you can see the difference in the physical facility and the staff. 

While you are touring the facility, pay attention to your gut feelings.  Ask yourself:

• Do I feel welcome?
• How long did I have to wait to meet with someone?
• Did the admissions director ask about my family member’s wants and needs?
• Is the facility clean?
• Are there any strong odors?
• Is the staff friendly?
• Do they seem to genuinely care for the residents?
• Do the staff seem to get along with each other?

Listen and observe. You can learn a lot just by watching and paying attention. And ask questions. You want to be sure that the facility is giving proactive care, not just reacting to crisis.  Here are a few examples of the types of questions the staff should be able to answer:

• How do you ensure that call lights are answered promptly, regardless of your staffing?
• If my father is not able to move or turn himself, how do you ensure that he is turned and does not develop bedsores?
• How do you make sure that someone is assisted with the activities of daily living like dressing, toileting and transferring?
• Can residents bring in their own supplies?
• Can residents use any pharmacy they wish?
• How many direct care staff members do you have on each shift? Does this number exceed the minimal number that state regulations require, or do you just meet the minimum standard?
• What sources of payment do you accept?
• How long has the medical director been with your facility?
• What is your policy on family care planning conferences? Will you adjust your schedule to make sure that I can attend the meeting?

While touring each facility, use my Nursing Home Evaluation Tool to help you keep track of which facility you like best.  

Don’t Forget Expert Legal Help.

In addition to finding the facility you like best, don’t forget that you need expert legal assistance as part of the nursing home planning process. Without proper planning and legal advice from an experienced Elder Law firm such as the Farr Law Firm, many families needlessly squander their life savings on long-term care, and unnecessarily jeopardize their own care and well-being, as well as the security of their family.   The way to get the best care in any nursing home is to make sure that you choose a nursing home that accepts Medicaid and work with a Certified Elder Law attorney who specializes in Medicaid Asset Protection.  

What is the goal of this type of planning? The goals differ from person to person and family to family. Generally, for a married couple the most important goal is to ensure that the spouse remaining at home is able to live the remaining years of his or her life in utmost dignity, without having to suffer a drastic reduction in his or her standard of living. For a single or widowed client, the most important goal is typically to be able to enjoy the highest quality of life possible in the event of an extended nursing home stay. When there is an adult child or grandchild who is disabled, the primary goal is typically to protect assets to be used for the benefit of that disabled family member who is often also receiving Medicaid.  Money that is protected through proper planning can be used to provide a nursing home resident with an enhanced level of care and a better quality of life while in a nursing home and receiving Medicaid benefits.

For instance, protected assets can be used to hire a private nurse or a private health aide — someone to provide one-on-one care to the
resident — to help the resident get dressed, to help the resident get to the bathroom, to help the resident at mealtime, and to act as the
resident’s eyes, ears and advocate.  Money that is sheltered through proper planning can also be used to purchase things for the nursing home resident or disabled child that are not covered by Medicaid — such as special medical devices, upgraded wheel chairs, transportation services, trips to the beauty salon, etc.

Lastly, some parents do have a strong desire to leave a financial legacy for their children, particularly if there is a disabled child or
someone who needs special financial help.  

The Farr Law Firm specializes in Medicaid Asset Protection.  When your family member needs nursing home care, please remember that we are here to help you.

Using a Reverse Mortgage to Pay for Home Care

Saturday, January 30th, 2010

Many of my clients ask me how I feel about reverse mortgages, and even more so this past week because of a favorable story that appeared in last week’s Washington Post entitled “Reverse Mortgages are Not the Next Subprime.”  This excellent article was written by the ”Mortgage Professor,” a Professor of Finance Emeritus at the Wharton School of the University of Pennsylvania (incidentally, my Alma Mater), and clears up much of the confusion and myths and fears surrounding the reverse mortgage.  I encourage all of you to read it.  Another good source of information about reverse mortgages is the Federal Trade Commission Fact Sheet

As a Certified Elder Law attorney, one of my primary goals is to help preserve the dignity and enhance the lives of my elderly clients.  For many of my clients, remaining in their homes as long as possible is one of their highest priorities.  I have been a long-time fan of reverse mortgages because they help my clients do exactly that — remain in their homes as long as possible.  

Why? Because in order to remain in your home as long as possible, you will most likely at some point need some home care.  “Home Care” can be health care and/or supportive care provided formally in your home by health care professionals (typically referred to as home health aides) or by paid or unpaid family members or friends (typically referred to as caregivers).  Often, the term “home care” is used to mean non-medical care, or custodial care, which may be provided by persons who are not nurses, doctors, or other licensed medical personnel.  The term “home health care” typically refers to care that is provided by a licensed health care professional — most often a Certified Nurse Assistant (CNA).  However, the terms are often used interchangeably, and for simplicity in this article I will use the term “home care” to refer to both types of care.

The goal of home care is typically to to allow you to remain at home and age in place, rather than being forced to move to an assisted living facility or nursing home.  Home Care providers render services in your own home. These services typically include a combination of health care services and life assistance services.

Health care services may include services such as wound care, administration of medication, physical therapy, speech therapy, and occupational therapy.  Life assistance services typically include help with daily tasks such as meal preparation, medication reminders, laundry, light housekeeping, errands, shopping, transportation, companionship, and help with the activities of daily living (ADLs), which typically refers to six activities (bathing, dressing, transferring, using the toilet, eating, and walking). 

Although some home care is provided by family members for free, most family caregivers need to be paid, and these payment arrangements should always be made pursuant to a written caregiver contract (prepared by an Elder Law Attorney) between the caregiver and the care recipient.  Because home care is quite expensive, having the proceeds from a reverse mortgage is often one of the  only ways that elders can afford to pay for appropriate home care. According to The 2009 MetLife Market Survey of Nursing Home, Assisted Living, Adult Day Services, and Home Care Costs, the 2009 national average hourly rate for home health aides increased by 5.0% from $20 in 2008 to $21 in 2009. The national average hourly rate for homemaker/companions increased by 5.6% from $18 in 2008 to $19 in 2009. 

Most of my clients, when they start out needing home care, will typically start with receiving 4 hours of care 3 days a week, which costs about $1,000 per month and is easily affordable for many people.  But over time, most of my clients progress to the point of needing upwards of 12 hours per day of home care, costing over $7,000 per month, and very few people can afford to pay for this type of care without eventually tapping into their home equity via a reverse mortgage.

The most common type of reverse mortgage is the Home Equity Conversion Mortgage (HECM), which completely protects your ability to remain in your home. So long as you pay your property taxes and homeowners insurance, and maintain your property, you can remain in your home forever. If the reverse mortgage lender fails, any unmet payment obligation to the borrower will be assumed by FHA. 

According to the Mortgage Professor’s article mentioned in my first paragraph, in 2009 about 130,000 HECMs were written, and feedback from borrowers has been mostly positive. In a 2006 survey of borrowers by AARP, 93% said that their reverse mortgage had a mostly positive effect on their lives.

For many of my clients, a reverse mortgage is the best way, and often the only way, for them to be able to afford to remain at home, despite the fact that reverse mortgages are expensive to obtain.  However, reverse mortgages are not for everyone, as there are other programs that may be able to help you remain in your home.  For instance, many of my clients are eligible for the Veterans Aid and Attendance benefit or for home-based Medicaid, or can be made eligible for these benefits through our process of Asset Protection

Whether you own your home outright or in a Revocable Living Trust or in my proprietary  Living Trust PlusTM Asset Protection Trust, if you think a reverse mortgage might be the solution you need, please contact me for a free consultation so I can evaluate your specific situation and advise you as to whether a reverse mortgage is your best option for allowing you to live comfortably in your home.

Evan Farr Teaches Course for Elder Law Attorneys Natonwide

Sunday, September 20th, 2009

~You Can Sign Up for a Similar Course for Consumers~

Last Thursday, Evan Farr conducted a national, attorney-only teleconference sponsored by the National Business Institute (NBI) on the topic of the Income Only Trust — an asset protection trust which, though very similar to a revocable living trust, when done properly protects assets transferred to it after five years in connection with Medicaid.

Here’s an article written about Evan’s seminar and about the income-only trust: http://tinyurl.com/l3qc7q.

This is the 2nd national teleseminar that Evan Farr has done for NBI on this topic. Evan has also done a similar national teleseminar for ALI-ABA (American Law Institute – American Bar Association), in connection with two recent scholarly publications for the legal profession published by ALI-ABA, with Evan Farr as the lead author, entitled Planning and Defending Asset Protection Trusts and Trusts for Senior Citizens.

If you’d like to attend a similar seminar for consumers, we still have openings for our 2 lunch seminars this week — on Tuesday and Thursday at noon. To register, please click the link to the right or call 703-691-1888 and speak to Jeannie.

For more information about the Income Only Trust, and about Evan Farr’s Living Trust Plus™ Asset Protection Trust (which is Evan’s highly-developed and perfected Income Only Trust, used by dozens of attorneys across the country), please visit http://www.livingtrustplus.com.

Every day, our firm helps clients protect significant assets through the use of the Living Trust Plus™ Asset Protection Trust and still qualify for Medicaid. Our Firm specializes in Asset Protection and Estate Planning for clients concerned about the devastating expenses of long-term care. To begin the process, please call us today at 703-691-1888.

Update on Virginia Life Estate Law

Wednesday, July 8th, 2009

In June of last year, I wrote that “in the near future, life estates will no longer be considered exempt assets when applying for Medicaid.” This was due to the fact that the Virginia General Assembly had recently passed legislation instructing DMAS (the Department of Medical Assistance Services, the agency that oversees the Virginia Medicaid program) to amend the State Medicaid Plan to consider all life estates as countable resources in the determination of Medicaid eligibility. After my column, the new change in Medicaid policy did indeed go into effect. However, since then, the policy has been changed yet again. This article will summarize the changes in the life estate law and explain the current Virginia Medicaid policy.

Life Estate Rule Made More Restrictive
Prior to August 2008, the Virginia Medicaid State Plan treated life estates in real property as exempt resources, meaning that the ownership of a life estate did not affect Medicaid eligibility. Effective August 28, 2008, the aforementioned change in Medicaid policy made life estates created after that date countable resources under most situations, though subject to the same exclusions that apply to other residential real estate (e.g. the home subject to the life estate would be exempt if the Medicaid Applicant, or a spouse or dependent child, was living in the home or the Medicaid Applicant was using “reasonable efforts” to sell the property interest, or during the first 6 months of institutionalization provided the Medicaid Applicant intended to return home).

The American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 (Recovery Act) that President Obama signed into law on February 17, 2009 provided increased federal funding for state Medicaid programs. To be eligible for the enhanced federal financing, states may not have eligibility standards, methods or procedures in place that are more restrictive than those effective on July 1, 2008. States that implemented more restrictive policies after July 1, 2008 had until July 1, 2009 to reverse these restrictions to receive the increased funding.

More Restrictive Life Estate Rule Rescinded
The August 28, 2008 change in Virginia Medicaid policy regarding life estates created a more restrictive eligibility standard than was in existence in Virginia on July 1, 2008. Therefore, in order for Virginia to qualify for the increased federal funding, the more restrictive life estate policy needed to be reversed. As of May 15, 2009, the more restrictive life estate policy was rescinded. Accordingly, we now have two diferrent Medicaid rules for life estates, depending on the date that the life estate was created:

* As a general rule, life estates created prior to August 28, 2008, or on or after February 24, 2009, are considered exempt assets.
* Life estates created on or after August 28, 2008, but before February 24, 2009, are treated in the same manner as other real property, subject to any applicable residential real property exclusions as mentioned above.

How Can Life Estates Now Be Used in Medicaid Asset Protection Planning?
Life estates have been used throughout Virginia history for many different purposes – Medicaid asset protection planning, estate planning, probate avoidance, and tax planning.

One asset protection strategy involves a parent purchasing a life estate in the home of a child. This strategy is specifically allowed by Medicaid under current law so long as the parent actually resides in the home for at least a year after the purchase of the life estate.

Another planning strategy involves the sale of real estate to a child, coupled with the retention of a life estate. This allows the parent to effectively sell the home for a discounted value, retain the lifetime right to live in the home, and avoid probate, while also preserving a step-up in basis for capital gains purposes on the death of the parent.

A third planning strategy involves the gift of real estate to a child, coupled with a retained life estate. Although this gift will trigger a period of Medicaid ineligibility if application for Medicaid is made within five years of the transfer, because the value of the remainder interest is lower than the full value of the entire piece of real estate, a gift of a remainder interest results in a shorter Medicaid penalty period than a transfer of the entire house.

A parent retaining a life estate in a home that is being sold or gifted to a child has several advantages:

1) The parent continues to qualify for any property tax exemptions such as senior citizens exemptions that were available prior to the transfer.
2) The parent retains the legal right to live in the property.
3) The parent retains the legal ability to obtain a reverse mortgage (with the agreement of the remainder beneficiary).
4) The child receives a stepped-up basis for capital gains tax purposes.

Life Estate transactions, and the financial and life expectency calculations that must be made in connection with these transactions, are extremely complicated and must be done pursuant to the applicable Medicaid regulations. It is essential that these types of transactions be done under the direct supervision of an experienced Elder Law firm such as the Farr Law Firm.

Aging is Not a Disease

Monday, June 30th, 2008

It is natural that health care providers such as doctors, pharmacists and nurses will have the same attitude towards aging as other Americans. Without proper geriatric care training, these people can fall into the same trap of treating the elderly differently from younger people. According to the Alliance for Aging Research,

“In recent years evidence has been mounting to suggest that, at all levels in the delivery of healthcare, there is a prevailing bias – ageism – that is at odds with the best interests of older people. This prejudice against the old in American healthcare is evidenced by scores of recent clinical studies, surveys and medical commentaries, many of which are referenced here. In this report, we outline five key dimensions of the ageist bias in which U.S. healthcare fails older Americans:

- Healthcare professionals do not receive enough training in geriatrics to properly care for many older patients.
- Older patients are less likely than younger people to receive preventive care.
- Older patients are less likely to be tested or screened for diseases and other health problems.
- Proven medical interventions for older patients are often ignored, leading to inappropriate or incomplete treatment.
- Older people are consistently excluded from clinical trials, even though they are the largest users of approved drugs.”

A fictional story, often used in the training of geriatric physicians, goes this way:

“A 90 year old man meets with his doctor and complains about pain in his right knee. The doctor tells him, “Well Henry, what do you expect? You’re 90 years old.”

Henry replies, “But doctor my left knee is the same age as my right knee, there’s no pain and it feels just fine!”

Many in the health-care profession consider old age to be a disease itself. Any medical problems are inappropriately attributed to old age as if it were a medical condition. And since there is no cure for old age, appropriate tests and treatment are never performed. Thus, medical problems that may not be related to age and may just as frequently occur in younger people are often not treated.

Withdrawing Your Early Social Security Benefit

Monday, May 5th, 2008

Did you elect to take Social Security benefits before your full retirement age? If you did and are now looking for extra income, there may be an answer. Once you reach full retirement age, you can pay back the money you have received and reapply for full retirement benefits.Although you can collect Social Security benefits between age 62 and your full retirement age, if you do, your benefits will be lower. For example, if you were born in 1944 and decide to retire and start collecting social security benefits at age 62, four years before your full retirement age of 66, your total benefit reduction is 25 percent. If your full benefit was to be $1,000 a month, your reduced benefit will be $750.

A little-known provision of Social Security allows you to withdraw your application for early benefits and reapply for your full benefits. The catch is that you must be able to pay back all the money you received so far. However, because you do not have to pay any interest on the benefits you received, if you can find the money to repay the benefits, it may be worth it. You could think of it as an interest-free loan.

If this is something you’re interested in exploring, you should contact your financial advisor and/or your CPA to determine if this option might make sense for your specific situation.

Buffett backs Estate Tax

Monday, December 3rd, 2007

Billionaire Warren Buffett urged Congress to preserve the estate tax, saying that plans to repeal it would benefit a handful of the richest American families and turn the country into a “plutocracy.” Buffett, the chairman of Berkshire Hathaway and the second-richest man in America testified before the Senate Finance Committee on Nov. 14, 2007. He told the panel, which is exploring ways to replace the ever-changing rules of the current estate tax system, that advocates of repeal are “dead wrong” to call the tax a “death tax.”

Buffett said it would be more appropriate to call it a “death present” because heirs get to calculate their capital gains on inherited assets based on the price when they inherited them rather than when the decedent originally bought them.

Buffett noted that so few Americans are subject to the estate tax that “you would have to be at 200 funerals to attend one where the decedent paid the tax.”

Currently, only estates worth more than $2 million are taxed by the federal government. The threshold is scheduled to rise to $3.5 million in 2009. For the year 2010, estates will be entirely free from federal taxation. However, the law that includes this provision expires at the end of 2010. Thus, unless Congress acts in the interim, the estate tax exemption will then revert to $1 million.

Senators on both sides of the aisle agreed that complete repeal of the estate tax will not happen anytime soon. “I think everyone in this room knows we’re not going to repeal the estate tax. It’s not going to happen in the foreseeable future,” said Committee Chairman Max Baucus (D-MT).

CCRC Resident Fights Move to Increased Level of Care

Monday, April 9th, 2007

An 88-year-old California widow is challenging an attempt by her continuing care retirement community (CCRC) to move her from her private apartment to an assisted living unit. If she is successful, the outcome could set a legal precedent for more than 5 million Americans living in retirement communities, CCRCs, and assisted living facilities.

In 1991, Sally Herriot and her husband, John, paid a $180,000 non-refundable entrance fee to Channing House, a Palo Alto that offers residents a continuum of care, from independent living to skilled nursing units. As is typical of CCRC contracts, the Herriot’s admission agreement gave Channing House’s administrators the right to determine the appropriate level of care for the couple and the authority to move either of them into an assisted living unit or a skilled nursing facility if and when it determined they needed more care.

Mr. Herriot died in 2005. Last year, Channing House notified Mrs. Herriot — who uses a walker, needs help getting dressed and has problems with her eyes — of their intention to move her from her spacious ninth-floor apartment with a covered balcony to a much smaller, hospital-like assisted-living unit where she would share a room but also be served by a trained nursing staff. Mrs. Herriot resisted, saying that with the help of the round-the-clock private aides she hires herself, she has everything she needs and does not require a higher level of care.

Mrs. Herriot’s attorneys, Michael Allen and Susan Silverstein (who is with AARP), filed a lawsuit alleging that by forcing Mrs. Herriot to move, Channing House is violating anti-discrimination housing and disability laws. Channing House’s executive director, Carl Braginsky, counters that decisions to move residents from one level of care to another are made only after careful consideration and consultation with medical staff. Paul Gordon, one of Channing House’s attorneys, rejected as “insulting and misleading” Mrs. Herriot’s attorneys’ assertions that such decisions are motivated by the opportunity for financial gain, such as from the sale of Mrs. Herriot’s now greatly-appreciated apartment.

The result of the case could have lasting repercussions on how America’s burgeoning population of seniors is allowed to age. “If Sally Herriot can be forced to move, then it undermines the whole concept of aging in place,” her attorney Michael Allen told the San Francisco Chronicle.

Lawyers on both sides are scheduled to begin mediation in April, and considering that CCRCs are in the business of marketing peace of mind, Channing House may have additional incentives to avoid a trial.

Charitable Donations From an IRA Offer New Opportunity

Monday, November 13th, 2006

For those wishing to make charitable donations from their IRA accounts, dealing with the resulting tax issues just got a lot easier. In August, Congress passed, and President Bush signed, the Pension Protection Act of 2006. Touted as the most significant overhaul of the pension system in the past 30 years, one provision of the law changes how charitable donations are taxed.

Previously, those wishing to make charitable donations using money in their IRA accounts were required to withdraw funds from their IRA and pay income tax on the withdrawal before they could take a charitable donation deduction on their annual tax returns. But under the new law, so long as the donation is transferred directly from an IRA or rollover IRA account to an eligible public charity, the donor doesn’t have to pay any income tax on the withdrawal at all. As far as the federal government is concerned, money donated to the charity simply is not income. (But note that the transfer is no longer eligible for the charitable tax deduction, either.)

It remains to be seen, however, whether such withdrawals for charitable purposes will count toward an individual’s minimum IRA distribution requirements for the year. If the qualifying donations do not count toward the distribution amounts, then donors will be required to withdraw more funds from their IRA accounts, and these funds will be subject to income tax. Unfortunately, the law is not clear on this issue.

Other requirements of the new charitable donation rule are clearer. They include:

- The donor must be 70 ½ years old.
- There is a $100,000 annual limit on donations.
- The donations may only be made from an IRA or rollover IRA account. Donations from other   retirement accounts, such as a 401(k), do not qualify.
- The organization receiving the donation must be a qualifying public charity. Donations to private foundations, supporting organizations, trusts established for both charitable and non-charitable purposes, or other funds over which the donor may have some advisory control do not qualify.
- The transfer must be made directly from the IRA account to the qualifying organization. This is ordinarily done by instructing the brokerage firm holding the IRA to make the transfer. If the donor receives the funds from the IRA and then donates them to charity, they will be subject to the income tax.

IRA holders can take advantage of the charitable donations provision until it expires on December 31, 2007.